CrisNews #2 - 05/01/94 Reprinted With Permission By: Cris Research Staff The Virus Threat (c) Ian Douglas 1993 Has the threat from viruses started to decline?  The number of viruses for the IBM PC (Intel x86) platform grows daily, but various events are making the IBM environment safer.  (Experts predict around 4000 - 6000 DOS viruses by the end of 1994.) Chief  amongst these is the move away from DOS to new operating systems.   The trend  started  with  Windows  (not really  an  operating  system),   and  has accelerated with the advent of a reliable OS/2.  Further down the line,  there is Windows NT and UNIX.  These environments are very unfriendly for the  3000+ DOS-based viruses.  There is a joke that Windows is a good virus detector - if a Windows file gets infected by a DOS virus, it crashes :-) There  are two known viruses that can infect Windows executables,  but none at present that can infect OS/2  executables.  No known DOS viruses can run under native  OS/2,  but only in a DOS session.  Also,  the constant upgrades to DOS itself prevent some viruses from working altogether. There  are three main areas of virus spread:  Large  businesses,   educational institutions, and swopping disks among friends. Many large business are moving to OS/2,  others will move to Windows NT. In both cases,  they are cutting out an important vector of virus spread.  I  foresee that educational institutions will  also move to these new operating systems in the near future.  The market will  demand  students trained in them.  This will once again cut out a  major vector for virus spreading. That  leaves  the average user,  still running DOS.  His has  less  chance  of getting a virus, since the two main vectors are being cut out. The most common viruses  are boot sector infectors,  like Stoned.  While these may be able  to infect a machine running OS/2, they will not spread from such a machine. The other interesting development has been in the underground.  In the race to create  the super-duper type viruses,  they have been trying to write  complex viruses. These take longer to write and are usually more buggy. Thus they make fewer  viruses.   In  order to brag,  they publish the viruses  in  electronic magazines, and make them available for download on virus exchange BBS's.  This means  that they end up in the hands of anti-virus authors,  before they  have had a chance to spread widely. Thus the AV authors soon include detection, and the virus does not spread very much. Many virus exchange BBS's have mostly junk (virus wannabe's)  available. Since the  person  downloading it only finds out afterwards,  the spread of  viruses from these BBS's is not as bad as it might have been. There  also  seems  to  be a growing maturity  amongst  some  members  of  the underground,  leading to fewer virus writers and viruses. Hopefully, they will ALL grow up soon. Cheers, Ian